Bread and butter EoMPLS
The Cisco ME3750 is an Ethernet services switch compliant to MEF 9 and 14. It can serve in a multitude of roles from delivering Martini draft L2 connectivity, providing H-QOS, VLAN re-writes, QinQ, CFM (OAM)…the list goes on. It will also provide L3 MPLS IP-VPN functionality, limited 
by throughput (due to tiny CPU) and limitation on number of routes (It’s a small switch right?!).The ME3750 and ME3400 are used everywhere you can imagine and like the ME3400, they’re considered bread and butter stuff for many service providers globally. Downsides? They do NOT stack (everyone knows a 3750 stacks!!!) and they only have two Gigabit ports which Cisco have defined as ES or Enhanced Services ports. The others are Fast Ethernet only. It kind of limits you to delivering 100Mbps circuits, which for WAN/MAN isn’t a great issue. DCIs over that speed is another issue. Also, it’s worth mentioning they’re now EOS. It’s normal for companies to use kit until it just doesn’t work and I expect the ME3750 not to be going anywhere fast whilst the feature set meets expectations.
I, like many people, tend to cable things up in a method which allows for service delivery without constant repatching. I accept there is a difference between throughput and function, but for the majority, delivering a 2Mbps CIR EoMPLS link over a VLAN which traverses the two Gigabit ports is a no brainer. Cable it up and forget. Our desired solution is this image: We want a single VLAN to traverse two sites and transport the Ethernet frame contents with it. The configuration (again looking a little like below – although simplified) was applied. Please note, this configuration is not complete, it lacks any MPLS/IGP/BGP/RSVP/LDP configuration, but in this example, accept they work for other services utilising the aforementioned technologies.
Config
|
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 |
int gig 1/1/1 switchport mode trunk description **ES-Port Config allowing all configured VLANs to traverse** switchport trunk allowed vlan add 100 ! int vlan 100 description **EoMPLS for VLAN 100** no ip address xconnect x.x.x.x 100 encapsulation mpls pw-class VLAN-EoMPLS ! pseudowire-class VLAN-EoMPLS encapsulation mpls interworking vlan |
Result? Doesn’t work 🙁 Bummer! Why not? The closest explanation was one I found in a Cisco guide doc stated you can’t run EoMPLS over the same ES ports that run MPLS. The way I interpret this is even if a VLAN traverses the ES port that has MPLS enabled on it. As a result I patched in another couple of cables between the L2 aggregation switches and the ME3750’s to the FE ports then moved the config. Did it work? As expected, yes. Just make sure you disable any spanning-tree safety features on the UNI port. I did have a couple of errdisables.
If anyone else has a different experience, I would like to hear it. This could be specific to software version 122-54.SE but I do not have any spare kit to test to otherwise test my theory. The other question could be, is it worth it? Well, in this tough economy, using these devices in this manor might save your company a lot of money.
David Gee
Attempting to share visions and experience with a wider community for the greater good of our industry in areas such as network device programmability, network automation, DevOps, SDN, NFV, silicon developments and programming/coding education for networkers. This blog is full of personal opinions that do not represent those of any employer. All thoughts and words are my own even if I occasionally have to eat them. Currently working as the EMEA Lead in NetDev Professional Services for Brocade based in the UK. This covers automation enablement, software networking, SDN, technology placement, software development, sales and pre-sales. Always available for a coffee fuelled debate. Nice coffee only please. I do not make any money from this blog and do not write in exchange for goods or cash. Thoughts are influenced directly from the industry and not by monetary gain.
Follow Me:
